The list was published online by National Assembly member Luis Tascón of the Fifth Republic Movement (MVR) party.
This article covers the origins, mechanisms, social consequences, legal precedents, and why people still search for updated PDF versions of this list. What Was the Tascón List?
Original copies of the list are primarily hosted on document-sharing sites rather than official government portals: Scribd Archive
In 2003, the Venezuelan opposition launched a movement to activate a recall referendum, a constitutional mechanism to cut short a presidential term. To do so, they collected nearly three million signatures. lista tascon pdf upd
I notice your request is a bit unclear. Could you please clarify what you need? For example:
Human Rights Watch Report (2008) : A comprehensive study on political discrimination in Venezuela.
The Lista Tascón was the initial public release of names. The Maisanta Program was a more comprehensive and invasive government database that allegedly integrated the list with other information to create detailed dossiers on citizens for surveillance and control purposes. The list was published online by National Assembly
Lista Tascón PDF UPD: History, Political Impact, and the Digital Legacy of Exclusion in Venezuela
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and administrative procedures in Venezuela change frequently. Consult with a licensed Venezuelan attorney before signing any state contract.
: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights condemned Venezuela for the discriminatory use of the list, ruling that it violated political rights and freedom of expression. Original copies of the list are primarily hosted
Even after Chávez publicly called to "bury" the list in 2005, it was integrated into more sophisticated software used by government agencies to cross-reference the political loyalty of job seekers. International Legal Repercussions
: The list was famously used as a litmus test for government jobs; Chávez himself stated on television that those who signed were "committing an act of terrorism" and should not have jobs in the state. 3. Legal and Human Rights Context Inter-American Court of Human Rights