Unlike many theoretical writers, Justice Singh wrote from the trenches. He understood that statutory interpretation is not a mechanical exercise but a . His writing style is lucid, precise, and steeped in a deep comparative understanding—drawing not just from Indian law, but from English, Australian, Canadian, and American precedents.
: This rule, also known as the "rule of purposive construction," requires that the court consider the "mischief" or problem that the statute was intended to address. The mischief rule is applied when the statute is ambiguous or unclear. principles of statutory interpretation gp singh high quality
Singh’s work also details linguistic canons that guide how words relate to one another: A word is known by the company it keeps. Unlike many theoretical writers, Justice Singh wrote from
The book is celebrated for its clear explanation of Latin maxims that govern judicial line-drawing. Justice Singh demystifies complex doctrines, including: : This rule, also known as the "rule
The treatise provides clarity on Latin maxims that govern judicial deduction.
GP Singh breaks down the complex rules of interpretation into several key approaches: A. The Literal (or Grammatical) Rule
This Latin maxim translates to: "That the thing may rather have effect than be destroyed."