Select . Click Have Disk... and click Browse .
The unique 16-bit Vendor ID allocated by the USB Implementers Forum (USB-IF). 0BB4 belongs exclusively to HTC. However, because HTC manufactured the earliest reference Android hardware (like the T-Mobile G1), many white-label, MediaTek (MT65xx)-driven, or custom Android platforms cloned or repurposed this exact Vendor ID for their debug connections.
The VID_0BB4&PID_0C01 identifier typically shows up in a few distinct situations:
Every USB device—whether it's a mouse, keyboard, or smartphone—contains a unique identifier to tell your computer what it is. This identifier is broken down into two parts: usb vid0bb4 amppid0c01 verified
In short, if you see this ID, your device is likely an older Android phone that has been put into a special state for system-level operations.
If the hardware ID contains an interface suffix (e.g., &MI_01 ), ensure you are installing the Android Composite ADB Interface variant rather than the Single interface driver.
certification, which verifies that the hardware won't cause power issues or communication failures on a USB bus. Microsoft Learn How to Manually Verify Your Device If you see this ID and want to confirm what it is: Select
Locate the broken entry (it may appear under Other Devices as "Android" or "ADB Interface"). Right-click the item and choose . Click Browse my computer for drivers .
The PID is also a 4-digit hexadecimal number that, combined with the VID, identifies a specific product made by that vendor.
: The term "verified" in this context usually refers to a digitally signed driver or a confirmed hardware match within a system's device manager or driver database. The Significance of VID_0BB4 & PID_0C01 The unique 16-bit Vendor ID allocated by the
Developers targeting ultra-legacy deployment environments or researching the evolution of the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) rely on this verified ID string to map deployment profiles in modern integrated development environments (IDEs). 3. Firmware Flashing and Data Recovery
If you actually found this listed as a “solid review” somewhere, that website is likely mislabeling system logs as user reviews.